Autism And Vitamin D An Intervention Study

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT

Objective: The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is conflicting. The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on ASD in children.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which vitamin D supplementation was used as a therapy in children with ASD. The PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL library, Web of Science, and Cinahl databases were searched from inception to March 20, 2019, for all publications on vitamin D and ASD with no restrictions. Studies involving individuals aged <18 years diagnosed with ASD and with all functional outcomes assessed by measurement scales for ASD were included. Mean differences were pooled, and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model due to differences between the individual RCTs.

Results: There were five RCTs with 349 children with ASD in the review, of which three RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Vitamin D supplementation indicated a small but significant improvement in hyperactivity scores (pooled MD: −3.20; 95% CI: [−6.06, −0.34]) with low heterogeneity (I² = 10%, p = 0.33), but there were no other statistically significant differences in ASD symptoms between groups as measured by validated scales.

Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation appears to be beneficial for hyperactivity but not for core symptoms or other co-existing behaviors and conditions of ASD. Future RCTs with large sample sizes examining the effect of vitamin D supplementation on ASD among individuals with low serum vitamin D levels at baseline are needed.

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a range of early-onset neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by difficulties with social interaction, impairments in verbal and non-verbal communications, and stereotyped repetitive behaviors¹. The global prevalence of ASD has dramatically increased over the past few years and is currently about 1 in 59 children². The rising ASD rates are ascribed to complex interactions between multiple genes and environmental components^3,4. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that concentrations of vitamin D are decreased in children with ASD compared to typically developing children^5–7. Vitamin D acts as a neuroactive steroid and plays an important role in brain development and mature brain function, and vitamin D receptors have also been found in the human brain^8,9. Pre-clinical work in animal models also indicates that vitamin D deficiency induces several changes in brain systems^10,11. These epidemiological and experimental data have prompted several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether vitamin D supplementation can decrease the risk of ASD. However, the results of the RCTs are inconsistent. For example, Mazahery et al.¹² showed that supplementation with vitamin D was superior over placebo in reducing irritability and hyperactivity¹², while Kerley et al.¹³ did not find an effect of vitamin D on the severity of ASD symptoms¹³. Recently, Song et al.¹⁴ examined the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in children with ASD through a meta-analysis¹⁴. However, it did not specially focus on symptoms of ASD such as social interaction, communication, and repetitive restrictive behaviors or interests (RRB) or symptoms or behaviors associated with ASD, including hyperactivity, irritability, and sensory issues. In addition, the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions pointed out that comparison of changes from baseline will enhance the statistical power and be more efficient than comparison of post-intervention values, which were analyzed in Song's study¹⁵.

Given the discrepancies in the included studies and the public health importance of clarifying the role of vitamin D in ASD, a meta-analysis on this subject is warranted. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs measuring the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in children with ASD compared with healthy controls.

Methods

Search strategy

This systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines¹⁶. To ensure a comprehensive search of the literature, keywords and their combinations were searched in multiple electronic databases including PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL library, Web of Science, and Cinahl from their date of inception to March 20, 2019, with no restrictions.

The search terms were as follows:'(vitamin D OR cholecalciferol OR ergocalciferol) AND ((vitamin D) AND (supplements OR supplementation OR intake)) AND (autistic disorder OR autism OR autism spectrum disorder OR Asperger)'. Reference lists of the original studies and reviews were scanned for additional studies. The search was limited to English articles, but no other restrictions were imposed.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Two investigators independently scrutinized the electronic searches and obtained the full articles for all studies that were potentially eligible for inclusion. Full-length articles of studies evaluating the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in children diagnosed with ASD were examined and subsequently selected if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) the design was an RCT, (2) the population was children aged <18 years whose primary diagnosis was ASD based on established criteria, (3) the protocols were specified for vitamin D supplementation only or vitamin D combined with other vitamins in children with ASD and placebo or no supplementation in the control group, and (4) there was at least one outcome measure, including core symptoms of ASD such as social interaction, communication, and RRB or symptoms or behaviors associated with ASD, including hyperactivity, irritability, and sensory issues.

Studies were excluded if they were individual case studies, conference abstracts, observational studies, proceedings without a related publication, reviews or meta-analyses of the literature, duplicate reports, assessments of autistic traits/behaviors rather than ASD diagnosis, or did not provide necessary data. Disagreements were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached.

Quality assessment

The methodological quality of each eligible RCT was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool by one researcher and checked by another¹⁵. The following seven items were assessed: random sequence generation (selection bias), allocation concealment (selection bias), blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), selective reporting (reporting bias), and other biases. Each item was assessed as having low, high, or unclear risk of bias, and all studies were assigned a summary score for study quality as assessed across studies. Disagreements were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached.

Data extraction and synthesis

The following information was independently extracted from the study reports by two researchers: the first author's last name, year of publication, country of origin, total sample size, sex distribution, age of children when the outcomes were assessed, vitamin D supplementation dose and duration, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level at baseline, the diagnostic criteria that were used, and information about study quality.

Statistical analysis

For each outcome, the mean change and standard deviation (SD) of change from baseline to endpoint for each intervention group (vitamin D and placebo) were entered into RevMan version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration) for analysis. If only baseline and end data were available, the mean change was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the end value, and the SD was then imputed from the mean correlation coefficient for an outcome from other studies in the meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis was performed using random effects due to differences between the individual RCTs. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs (net changes in scores) were calculated for continuous outcomes (ASD symptom scale) between the vitamin D and control groups. Heterogeneity between included studies was assessed using both the Chi² statistic (p < 0.1 showed substantial or considerable heterogeneity) and the I ² statistic (I ² 0%–40%, low; 30%–60%, moderate; 50%–90%, substantial; 75%–100%, considerable heterogeneity)¹⁵. No subgroup analyses or meta-regressions were performed due to the limited number of studies included in the meta-analysis. In addition, publication bias was not assessed because very few studies contributed data.

Results

Search results and study selection

A total of 425 articles were found in our initial search, and 89 were duplicates. After removal of duplicates, 317 were excluded by screening abstracts or titles leaving 19 articles to be assessed for eligibility. After reading the full text, five studies met the inclusion criteria and three were included in the final analysis^12,13,17. Two studies were included in the overall interpretation but not included in the meta-analysis due to the use of an assessment tool not used by the others^18,19. The reasons for excluding the 14 full texts were as follows: 8 did not answer our systematic review question^20–27, 1 was retracted by the journal due to incorrect data²⁸, 2 were case reports^29,30 and 3 were open-label trials^31–33. The screening and selection of the studies are presented in the PRISMA flowchart shown in Figure 1.

The effect of vitamin D supplementation in treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Published online:

07 September 2020

Figure 1. Flow diagram for selection of studies (PRISMA flow diagram).

Study characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the included studies. Among them, two studies were conducted in New Zealand^12,17, one in Egypt¹⁸, one in Iran¹⁹ and one in Ireland¹³. All five studies were published in English between 2014 and 2019, and the five selected trials recruited 349 participants aged 2–12 years diagnosed with ASD (309 were male and 40 were female). Vitamin D supplementation was in the form of cholecalciferol in all five RCTs. For the intervention group, the daily doses were 2,000 IU/day in four RCTs, and the remaining study used 300 IU/kg/day not to exceed 5,000 IU/day¹⁹. All included studies except one were placebo-controlled. All studies included both males and females, except for the Moradi, 2018, study¹⁹ that only included males. The male to female ratio ranged from 3/1–7/1. The interventions lasted 3 months (one RCT), 5 months (one RCT), 6 months (one RCT), and 12 months (two RCTs).

The effect of vitamin D supplementation in treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Published online:

07 September 2020

Table 1. Characteristics of the RCTs included in the systematic review.

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) was the scale most commonly used to evaluate the behaviors of children, but the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC), the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Sensory Processing Measures (SPM), the Developmental Disabilities-Children's Global Assessment Scale (DD-CGAS), and the stereotypy subscale of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (SSGARS-2) were also used. Of the five RCTs included, full data were available for only three RCTs using the same assessment tool (ABC or SRS) and only these three were included in the final meta-analysis ^{12,13, 17}.

Risk for bias in the included studies

Figure 2 shows the risk for bias. Two studies^18,19 that did not mention the method of random-sequence generation were considered to have unclear risk for randomization bias. Other studies used computer generated numbers and block randomization stratified by age and severity of ASD^12,13,17. Three studies^13,18,19 were assessed as having unclear risk of allocation concealment bias owing to insufficient information. The other two trials used a third party for randomization^12,17. Only two studies were reported as double-blinded (researchers and children/caregivers)^12,17. One study was reported to have high risk of performance bias¹⁸. It is unclear if researchers/assessors and participants were blinded in the other two studies^13,19. The blinding was maintained throughout the trial until after data analysis in only two trials^12,17, and no details were provided for the blinding of outcome assessment in the other three studies^13,18,19. There were low rates of loss to follow-up in all five studies. All outcomes in all trials were reported. The potential for other biases was not apparent in any study.

The effect of vitamin D supplementation in treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Published online:

07 September 2020

Figure 2. Risk for bias for individual and across studies.

Effect of vitamin D on core symptoms of ASD

Social interaction: Of the two studies testing the effect of vitamin D supplementation on ASD (assessed using the ABC), one study examined both vitamin D alone and vitamin D together with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation¹². In this case, the study could be considered as two independent reports. Thus, there were three independent RCTs involving 104 participants included in this meta-analysis. The pooled effect estimates for social interaction did not differ between the intervention and control groups in changes of mean scores (pooled MD: −1.54; 95% CI: [−4.09, 1.01]; p = 0.24), and no heterogeneity was seen (Figure 3(a)). The mean change scores decreased (showing an improvement) in all intervention groups in these studies. Removing the study¹² that examined vitamin D together with DHA supplementation did not change the results. Additionally, one RCT¹⁸ that was not included in the meta-analysis did not find any effect of vitamin D supplementation on social interaction (as measured by the CARS and ATEC, all p > 0.05).

The effect of vitamin D supplementation in treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Published online:

07 September 2020

Figure 3. Forest plot of the random-effects meta-analysis comparing vitamin D supplementation in children with ASD with placebo for social interaction (a), communication (b), and RRB (c) as assessed by the ABC measurement scale. Mazahery 2018a looked at the effect of receiving vitamin D supplementation only, while Mazahery 2018b looked at the effect of receiving vitamin D supplementation along with DHA.

Using the SRS social interaction sub-domains, the Mazahery, 2019, study¹⁷, which tested the effect of vitamin D alone and together with DHA supplementation, found no effect of vitamin D supplementation on social interaction such as social skills (pooled MD: −5.80; 95% CI: [−13.67, 2.07]; p = 0.15), social awareness (pooled MD: −1.26; 95% CI: [−2.77, 0.25]; p = 0.10), social cognition (pooled MD: 0.31; 95% CI: [−1.44, 2.05]; p = 0.73), or social motivation (pooled MD: −0.90; 95% CI: [−3.02, 1.21]; p = 0.40) and found no heterogeneity (Figure 4(a)).

The effect of vitamin D supplementation in treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Published online:

07 September 2020

Figure 4. Forest plot of the random-effects meta-analysis comparing vitamin D supplementation in children with ASD with placebo for social interaction (a), communication (b), and RRB (c) as assessed by the SRS measurement scale. Mazahery 2019a looked at the effect of receiving vitamin D supplementation only, while Mazahery 2019b looked at the effect of receiving vitamin D supplementation along with DHA.

Similarly, Kerley et al. ¹³ and Mazahery et al. ¹⁷ also used other tools, including the DD-CGAS and the social interaction sub-domain of the SPM, respectively. Neither study found any effect of vitamin D supplementation on social interaction.

Communication: There were no significant differences between groups in changes of mean scores for communication as assessed using the ABC (pooled MD: −0.05; 95% CI: [−1.79, 1.69]; p = 0.96), and moderate heterogeneity was found in the meta-analysis (I²= 60%, p= 0.08) (Figure 3(b)). Removing the study¹² that tested the effect of vitamin D/DHA together had no impact on the overall result.

Mazahery et al.¹⁷ also used the communication sub-domain of the SRS to assess of the effect of vitamin D supplementation alone or combined with DHA on communication. There were no significant differences between groups in changes of mean scores (pooled MD: −2.53; 95% CI: [−6.66, 1.61]; p = 0.23), and no heterogeneity was seen in the meta-analysis (I²= 0%, p= 0.87) (Figure 4(b)). Likewise, Kerley et al. ¹³ did not find any effect of vitamin D supplementation on communication using the DD-CGAS tools.

Repetitive and restricted behaviors and interests: RRB scores (measured by the ABC) did not differ between the vitamin D supplementation and placebo groups (pooled MD: 0.85; 95% CI: [−0.33, 2.02]; p = 0.16), and no heterogeneity was seen (I²= 0%, p= 0.77) (Figure 3(c)). Removing the Mazahery, 2018b, study¹² that examined the effect of vitamin D/DHA together did not affect the overall result. Neither Mazahery et al.¹⁷ (using the RRB sub-domain of the SRS) (Figure 4(c)) nor Moradi et al.¹⁹ (using the SSGARS-2 subscale) showed an effect of vitamin D intervention on RRB (p > 0.05).

Effect of vitamin D on co-existing conditions

Hyperactivity: Based on three RCTs involving 104 participants, a significant difference was noted between the intervention and control groups in hyperactivity scores assessed by the ABC (pooled MD: −3.20; 95% CI: [−6.06, −0.34]; p = 0.03), and low heterogeneity was seen in the meta-analysis (I²= 10%, p = 0.33) (Figure 5(a)). Sensitivity analysis by removing the study¹² that tested the effect of vitamin D/DHA together had an effect on the overall result, and no statistically significant effect was found for vitamin D supplementation alone on ASD (pooled MD: −2.08; 95% CI: [−7.96, 3.80]; p = 0.49), and moderate heterogeneity was found (I² = 54%, p = 0.14).

The effect of vitamin D supplementation in treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Published online:

07 September 2020

Figure 5. Forest plot of the random-effects meta-analysis comparing vitamin D supplementation in children with ASD with placebo for hyperactivity (a) and irritability (b) as assessed by the ABC measurement scale. Mazahery 2018a looked at the effect of receiving vitamin D supplementation only, while Mazahery 2018b looked at the effect of receiving vitamin D supplementation along with DHA.

Irritability: Irritability scores (assessed by the ABC) did not differ between the vitamin D intervention and placebo groups (pooled MD: −2.31; 95% CI: [−6.08, 1.46]; p = 0.23), and substantial heterogeneity was found in the meta-analysis (I² = 64%, p = 0.06) (Figure 5(b)). Sensitivity analysis by removing the study¹² that tested the effect of vitamin D/DHA together had no effect on the overall result.

Sensory issues: The Mazahery, 2019, study¹⁷ was the only study that assessed the effect of vitamin D intervention on sensory issues (using the SPM sensory profile sub-domains of vision, hearing, touch, taste, and smell). Neither the vitamin D intervention group nor the placebo group showed any trends for improvement (all p > 0.05). Publication bias could not be determined for any outcome measures due to the small number of studies included the meta-analysis (n = 3).

Tolerability and safety

All RCTs included in this review concluded that vitamin D supplementation was well tolerated and safe. Adverse effects reported were not serious and were comparable across the intervention and control groups.

Discussion

Only a few RCTs have been published on vitamin D supplementation for ASD, and only five trials were included in this review (three included in the meta-analysis and two in the overall interpretation), with a total of 349 participants. In contrast with the recent meta-analysis by Song et al. ¹⁴, our results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of core symptoms and co-existing behaviors and conditions of ASD as measured by validated scales in this meta-analysis. With one exception, among the studies that used the ABC assessment tools there was a significant difference between groups for the hyperactivity subscale score. The limited available evidence suggests that vitamin D supplementation does not benefit the performance of children with ASD other than a significant improvement in hyperactivity symptoms.

Our findings should be considered cautiously because of possible influences of the different methodologies used in the included studies. First, most observational studies have shown that low vitamin D status in children at baseline is associated with the development of ASD^32,34,35, and a recent meta-analysis of the relationship between serum 25(OH)D levels and risk for ASD indicated an inverse association³⁶. It has been proposed that oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction are prevalent in individuals with ASD^37,38, whereas vitamin D has been shown to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation and to protect the genome from oxidative stress and DNA damage³⁹. Participants with low serum 25(OH)D levels might therefore be expected to show the greatest effect of vitamin D supplementation on ASD. Gowda et al. ⁴⁰ reported that the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in improving serum 25(OH)D was mainly affected by baseline 25(OH)D levels, the length of supplementation, and habitual dietary intake of vitamin D. Those with lower baseline serum 25(OH)D levels had a greater chance of experiencing a greater increase in serum 25(OH)D in response to supplementation. However, most of the studies in the present meta-analysis included participants with sufficient 25(OH)D levels at baseline.

Second, two of the three RCTs included in the meta-analysis examined both vitamin D alone and vitamin D together with DHA supplementation^12,17. Our sensitivity analysis, which excluded studies that administered vitamin D supplementation along with DHA, did not find any effect on the core symptoms of ASD. On the other hand, the results of combined vitamin D alone and vitamin D along with DHA supplementation on ASD showed a significant reduction in hyperactivity, which changed the effect of vitamin D-only supplementation on ASD. We also found no effect of vitamin D/DHA together on ASD (MD: −3.70; 95% CI: [−7.91, 0.51]), as shown in Figure 5(a). Additionally, the previous meta-analysis did not support an effect of DHA alone on ASD in children⁴¹. In this case, our analysis could not distinguish an independent effect of vitamin D on ASD. The loss of significance highlights the importance of combination therapy of vitamin D supplements on children with ASD. Whether vitamin D given together with DHA is more beneficial than vitamin D alone needs to be clarified in future RCTs.

Third, it may be possible that the measurement scales employed in the included studies influenced the findings. Although most of the included RCTs used the ABC to assess problem behaviors in ASD, other assessments designed for diagnostic purposes were only used in individual RCTs. Consequently, the generalizability of the results is limited. In addition, the inappropriate speech subscale of the ABC is not a comprehensive measure of communication compared to other assessment tools like the SRS, and therefore the results of the communication subscale of the ABC should be interpreted with caution.

Our findings may have implications for future research. The current evidence does not support vitamin D supplementation as monotherapy for children with ASD. However, it seems feasible that vitamin D might be used to complement other treatments for ASD considering its long-term tolerability and acceptability^42,43, its critical role in brain function and development, and its roles in various metabolic pathways involved in the pathobiology of ASD³⁸. It will be important to employ one uniform assessment tool in order to reduce methodological bias.

Strengths and limitations

There were several strengths in the present meta-analysis. First of all, it is the first systematic review to summarize the evidence regarding vitamin D supplementation for ASD treatment. We also applied to PROSPERO and registered the systematic review protocol prior to starting the review process (CRD42020157572). In addition, our meta-analysis used the rigorous methodology developed by the Cochrane Collaboration and applied several methods to reduce bias such as a comprehensive literature search and rigorous eligibility and methodological assessments. Lastly, two of the included studies were of high methodological quality, and heterogeneity among studies was rather low^12,17.

Based on only five RCTs with a limited number of 349 participants, our review is likely to be underpowered for addressing some outcomes and insufficient for drawing trustworthy conclusions. Furthermore, we note the small sample sizes in some trials, and there were potential biases across some of the study designs. Three studies had a high risk for selection bias due to uncertain allocation concealment and lack of blinding^13,18,19. In addition, all three studies included in the meta-analysis were performed in high-income, developed countries, so the conclusions are not necessarily generalizable for low-income countries. Publication bias and subgroup analysis on important parameters such as trial duration and 25(OH)D levels at baseline could not be investigated through funnel plots or other analyses due to the limited number of studies.

To summarize, this study is the first systematic review to examine the available clinical data in order to assess the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation versus placebo for children with ASD. In the current meta-analysis, a small but significant benefit of vitamin D supplementation was found for hyperactivity, but our study did not support the evidence for vitamin D supplementation in improving core and other co-existing symptoms in children with ASD. Future RCTs that take low serum 25(OH) D levels at baseline, trial duration, and the dose and frequency of vitamin D supplementation into consideration are needed to determine the efficacy of vitamin D on ASD.

Table 1. Characteristics of the RCTs included in the systematic review.

RCTs included in the meta-analysis (n = 3)
Author, year	Country	Total	Sex distribution (M, F)	Age (years)	Baseline serum 25(OH)D (nmol/L)	Treatment	Dose	Duration	Outcome measure	Study quality
Mazahery, 2018¹²a	New Zealand	73	60M, 13F	2.5–8 (5.2, mean)	Mean: 68 ± 21	Vitamin D3	2000 IU/day	12 months	ABC	RDBPC
Mazahery, 2018¹²b	New Zealand	73	60M, 13F	2.5–8 (5.2, mean)	Mean: 60 ± 24	Vitamin D3 + DHA	2000 IU/day	12 months	ABC	RDBPC
Mazahery, 2019¹⁷a	New Zealand	117	100M, 17F	2.5–8 (5.2, mean)	Mean: 63 ± 27	Vitamin D3	2000 IU/day	12 months	SRS, SPM	RDBPC
Mazahery, 2019¹⁷b	New Zealand	117	100M, 17F	2.5–8 (5.2, mean)	Mean: 56 ± 26	Vitamin D3 + DHA	2000 IU/day	12 months	SRS, SPM	RDBPC
Kerley, 2017	Ireland	38	33M, 5F	7.1 (mean)	Median: 54.2	Vitamin D3	2000 IU/day	5 months	ABC, DD-CGAS	RDBPC
RCTs not included in the meta-analysis but included in the overall interpretation (n = 2)
Author, year	Country	Total	Sex distribution (M, F)	Age (years)	Baseline serum 25(OH)D (nmol/L)	Treatment	Dose	Duration	Outcome measure	Study quality
Azzam, 2014	Egypt	21	16 M, 5F	2–12	Mean: 59 ± 33	Vitamin D3	2000 IU/day	6 months	CARS, ATEC	Unclear randomization
Moradi, 2018	Iran	100	100 M	6–9 (7.6, mean)	Mean: 4.61 ± 12.6	Vitamin D3	300 IU/day/kg–5000 IU/day	4 months	SSGARS-2	Unclear randomization; placebo-controlled

Abbreviations: ABC, Aberrant Behavior Checklist; CARS, Childhood Autism Rating Scale; ATEC, Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist; SRS, the Social Responsiveness Scale; SPM, Sensory Processing Measures; DD-CGAS, Developmental Disabilities-Children's Global Assessment Scale; SSGARS-2, the stereotypy subscale of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition; RDBPC, Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled; M, male; F, female.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Dr. Yong Gan, lecturer, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, for his assistance in developing the statistical strategy. This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (171100310200), the Health Department of Henan Province, China, the Swedish Research Council, Sweden (2018-02667, 2018-02682), the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-813291).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes on contributors

Bingbing Li is a researcher at the Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, Third Affiliated Hospital and Institute of Neuroscience of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. Her research mainly focuses on the effects and mechanisms of nutrients on childhood neurological diorders, including cerebral palsy, autism and brain injury in premature infants.

Yiran Xu is a postdoc at Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, Third Affiliated Hospital and Institute of Neuroscience of Zhengzhou University, China. His research focuses on the discovery and characterization of molecular and genetic mechanisms in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability, autism, epilepsy, and cerebral palsy.

Xiaoli Zhang is a postdoctoral researcher at the Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, Third Affiliated Hospital and Institute of Neuroscience of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. Her research mainly focuses on the immunity mechanism of brain injury in premature infants.

Lingling Zhang is a PhD student at Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, Third Affiliated Hospital and Institute of Neuroscience of Zhengzhou University. Her research interest is to investigate the potential contribution of microbiota on the development child autism spectrum disorders and intervention effect of probiotics.

Yanan Wu is a research assistant at the Department of Researcher Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China. Her research interest is in studying the role of different cell death types in developing neurological disorders, especially in stress induced brain damages, such as hypoxic-ischemic brain damages and hemorrhagic brain injuries.

Xiaoyang Wang is an Associate Professor at the Department of Physiology at Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Her research interest is to fundamentally advance our knowledge of the key factors that impact on brain development and injury processes in the perinatal period and to generate prevention/treatment modalities for perinatal brain injury and neurological sequela, such as autism spectrum disorders, cerebral palsy.

Changlian Zhu is Professor of Pediatrics and Associate Professor of Neurobiology. He established a close collaboration between Zhengzhou University of China and Gothenburg University of Sweden, in the field of developing brain injury. His research interest is to pursuit of novel therapeutic strategies for developing brain injury and its neurological sequelae through experimental and clinical approaches.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology [grant number 171100310200], the Health Department of Henan Province, China, the Swedish Research Council, Sweden [grant number 2018-02667, 2018-02682], the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-813291).

References

Eigsti IM , Shapiro T. A systems neuroscience approach to autism: biological, cognitive, and clinical perspectives. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9:206–16. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10081 [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]
Baio J , Wiggins L , Christensen DL , Maenner MJ , Daniels J , Warren Z , et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveillance Summaries. 2018;67:1–23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Hertz-Picciotto I , Croen LA , Hansen R , Jones CR , Van de Water J , Pessah IN. The CHARGE study: an epidemiologic investigation of genetic and environmental factors contributing to autism. Environ Health Persp. 2006;114:1119–25. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8483 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Hallmayer J , Cleveland S , Torres A , Phillips J , Cohen B , Torigoe T , et al. Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68:1095–102. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.76 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Meguid NA , Hashish AF , Anwar M , Sidhom G. Reduced serum levels of 25-hydroxy and 1, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D in Egyptian children with autism. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16:641–5. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0349 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Arastoo AA , Khojastehkia H , Rahimi Z , Khafaie MA , Hosseini SA , Mansouri MT , et al. Evaluation of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in children with autism spectrum disorder. Ital J Pediatr. 2018;44:150. doi: 10.1186/s13052-018-0587-5 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Schmidt RJ , Niu Q , Eyles DW , Hansen RL , Iosif AM. Neonatal vitamin D status in relation to autism spectrum disorder and developmental delay in the CHARGE case–control study. Autism Res. 2019;12:976–88. doi: 10.1002/aur.2118 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Eyles DW , Burne TH , McGrath JJ. Vitamin D, effects on brain development, adult brain function and the links between low levels of vitamin D and neuropsychiatric disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2013;34:47–64. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2012.07.001 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Ali A , Cui X , Eyles D. Developmental vitamin D deficiency and autism: putative pathogenic mechanisms. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;175:108–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.12.018 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Kesby JP , Cui X , O'Loan J , McGrath JJ , Burne TH , Eyles DW. Developmental vitamin D deficiency alters dopamine-mediated behaviors and dopamine transporter function in adult female rats. Psychopharmacology. 2010;208:159. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1717-y [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Ko P , Burkert R , McGrath J , Eyles D. Maternal vitamin D3 deprivation and the regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle during rat brain development. Dev Brain Res. 2004;153:61–8. doi: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.07.013 [Crossref], [PubMed] , [Google Scholar]
Mazahery H , Conlon CA , Beck KL , Mugridge O , Kruger MC , Stonehouse W , et al. A randomised controlled trial of vitamin D and omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in the treatment of irritability and hyperactivity among children with autism spectrum disorder. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;187:9–16. Epub 2018 Oct 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.10.017 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Kerley CP , Power C , Gallagher L , Coghlan D. Lack of effect of vitamin D3 supplementation in autism: a 20-week, placebo-controlled RCT. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:1030–6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312783 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Song L , Luo X , Jiang Q , Chen Z , Zhou L , Wang D , et al. Vitamin D supplementation is beneficial for children with Autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020;18:203–13. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.2.203 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Liberati A , Altman DG , Tetzlaff J , Mulrow C , Gøtzsche PC , Ioannidis JP , et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W-65–W-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Higgins J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. www cochrane-handbook org 2011. [Google Scholar]
Mazahery H , Conlon CA , Beck KL , Mugridge O , Kruger MC , Stonehouse W , et al. A randomised-controlled trial of vitamin d and omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in the treatment of core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder in children. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49:1778–94 doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3860-y [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Azzam HM , Sayyah H , Youssef S , Lotfy H , Abdelhamid IA , Abd Elhamed HA , et al. Autism and vitamin D: An intervention study. Middle East Current Psychiatry. 2015;22:9–14. doi: 10.1097/01.XME.0000457269.05570.78 [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]
Moradi H , Sohrabi M , Taheri H , Khodashenas E , Movahedi A. Comparison of the effects of perceptual-motor exercises, vitamin D supplementation and the combination of these interventions on decreasing stereotypical behavior in children with autism disorder. Int J Dev Disabil. 2018: 1–10.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Ansari Kolachahi S , Hojjati Zidashti Z , Elmieh A , Bidabadi E. Comparison of aquatic exercise program and vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D and hs-CRP serum levels in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Jahrom Univ Med Sci. 2018;16:48–56. [Google Scholar]
Moradi H , Sohrabi M , Taheri H , Khodashenas E , Movahedi A. The effects of different combinations of perceptual-motor exercises, music, and vitamin D supplementation on the nerve growth factor in children with high-functioning autism. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;31:139–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.02.005 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Liu X , Liu J , Xiong X , Yang T , Hou N , Liang X , et al. Correlation between nutrition and symptoms: nutritional survey of children with autism spectrum disorder in Chongqing, China. Nutrients. 2016;8:294. doi: 10.3390/nu8050294 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Srinivasan S , O'Rourke J , Bersche Golas S , Neumeyer A , Misra M. Calcium and vitamin D supplement prescribing practices among providers caring for children with autism spectrum disorders: are we addressing bone health? Autism Res Treat. 2016;2016:6763205.[PubMed] , [Google Scholar]
Bittker SS , Bell KR. Acetaminophen, antibiotics, ear infection, breastfeeding, vitamin D drops, and autism: an epidemiological study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:1399–414. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S158811 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Fahmy SF , Sabri NA , El Hamamsy MH , El Sawi M , Zaki OK. Vitamin D intake and sun exposure in autistic children. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7:1043–9.[Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Zimmer MH , Hart LC , Manning-Courtney P , Murray DS , Bing NM , Summer S. Food variety as a predictor of nutritional status among children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42:549–56. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1268-z [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Kerley CP. Dietary patterns and components to prevent and treat heart failure: a comprehensive review of human studies. Nutr Res Rev. 2019;32:1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0954422418000148 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Saad K , Abdel-Rahman AA , Elserogy YM , Al-Atram AA , El-Houfey AA , Othman HA-K , et al. Retracted: randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;59:20–9. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12652 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Jia F , Wang B , Shan L , Xu Z , Staal WG , Du L. Core symptoms of autism improved after vitamin D supplementation. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e196–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2121 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Infante M , Sears B , Rizzo AM , Mariani Cerati D , Caprio M , Ricordi C , et al. Omega-3 PUFAs and vitamin D co-supplementation as a safe-effective therapeutic approach for core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder: case report and literature review. Nutr Neurosci. 2018: 1–12. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2018.1557385 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Feng J , Shan L , Du L , Wang B , Li H , Wang W , et al. Clinical improvement following vitamin D3 supplementation in autism spectrum disorder. Nutr Neurosci. 2017;20:284–90. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2015.1123847 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Saad K , Abdel-rahman AA , Elserogy YM , Al-Atram AA , Cannell JJ , Bjørklund G , et al. Vitamin D status in autism spectrum disorders and the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in autistic children. Nutr Neurosci. 2016;19:346–51. doi: 10.1179/1476830515Y.0000000019 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Stubbs G , Henley K , Green J. Autism: will vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and early childhood reduce the recurrence rate of autism in newborn siblings? Med Hypotheses. 2016;88:74–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.01.015 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Kocovská E , Andorsdóttir G , Weihe P , Halling J , Fernell E , Stóra T , et al. Vitamin D in the general population of young adults with autism in the Faroe Islands. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:2996–3005. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2155-1 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Gong Z-L , Luo C-M , Wang L , Shen L , Wei F , Tong R-J , et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in Chinese children with autism spectrum disorders. Neuroreport. 2014;25:23–7. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000161 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Wang T , Shan L , Du L , Feng J , Xu Z , Staal WG , et al. Serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;25:341–50. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0786-1 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Cannell JJ. Vitamin D and autism, what's new? Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18:183–93. doi: 10.1007/s11154-017-9409-0 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Nair-Shalliker V , Armstrong BK , Fenech M. Does vitamin D protect against DNA damage? Mutat Res. 2012;733:50–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.02.005 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Holick MF , Binkley NC , Bischoff-Ferrari HA , et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1911–30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Gowda U , Ruwanpathirana T , Fong DPS , Kaur A , Renzaho AMN. Efficacy of high dose vitamin D supplementation in improving serum 25(OH)D among migrant and non migrant population: a retrospective study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1798-3 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Horvath A , Łukasik J , Szajewska H. ω−3 fatty acid supplementation does not affect autism spectrum disorder in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr. 2017;147:367–76. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.242354 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Leventis P , Kiely P. The tolerability and biochemical effects of high-dose bolus vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation in patients with vitamin D insufficiency. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009;38:149–53. doi: 10.1080/03009740802419081 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]
Radhakishun NN , Van Vliet M , Poland DC , Weijer O , Beijnen JH , Brandjes DP , et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a high loading dose (25,000 IU weekly) vitamin D3 supplementation in obese children with vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency. Horm Res Pædiatr. 2014;82:103–6. doi: 10.1159/000362236 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]

Autism And Vitamin D An Intervention Study

Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1028415X.2020.1815332

Autism And Vitamin D An Intervention Study

Gene Desember 03, 2021